🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have harvested a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts noted the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to train their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its full catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a external actor collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Mission and Worries

Spotify does not believe the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated data is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “create their own personal free equivalent of the service”. He added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a government suggestion to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.