🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be lowered to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia states the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.